CO129-326 - Foreign Office - 1904 — Page 361

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

358

constitute a strong case against him.

Otherwise I

a reward for the murder of Yeung Kui-wan.

It was

in his barracks that the conspirators are said to

have met (page 10). He is stated to have issued

a certificate of merit to one of the persons implicated in the actual commission of the murder (page

11), and to have specially deputed him to carry it

out (page 12).

C. is Ng Lo Sam, described as a police agent,

but lately the keeper of a gambling house at Canton.

The only witness at the trial who mentioned him

was Kong Ngau Ying, since dead (page 12 of the Judge's

Notes:- he described a meeting of the conspirators

at C.'s house on the night of the murder, but does

not say that C. was present). He is also mentioned

in the dying declaration of Yeung Kui-wan, page 19,

but it is there only said that one Kwang told the

dying man that the Provincial Treasurer had commissioned C. to compass his murder. I do not notice

Kwang's name in the list of witnesses now available.

But I observe that the Attorney-General considers

the statements of yourself and the Kongs to constitute

should have been of opinion that the evidence against

him was not of much value.

He had been in

In December, 1901, Mr. J. Scott, His Majesty's

Consul General, examined the evidence that was then

procurable against this man, and came to the conclusion that nothing could be proved.

the employ of the Hongkong police, and, as Mr. Scott

says: "went and came in the pay of Canton and Hong-

kong alike, leaving no trace of his dealings, and so

cleverly playing his double game that according to the

highest legal opinion no conviction could be obtained

against him in the Hongkong Courts." He was, however,

expelled from Hongkong owing to the suspicions

entertained of his complicity in the murder.

To sum up so much as came out at the trial with

regard to these three men, I think one can only say

that there is evidence to implicate Tung Cheong (A.)

in the commission of the murder, that there is some

against the captain of the gunboat, though not so di-

rect nor so strong, as having entered into a conspiracy

to

acy

Edit History

2026-06-02 05:15:09 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
358 constitute a strong case against him. Otherwise I a reward for the murder of Yeung Kui-wan. It was in his barracks that the conspirators are said to have met (page 10). He is stated to have issued a certificate of merit to one of the persons implicated in the actual commission of the murder (page 11), and to have specially deputed him to carry it out (page 12). C. is Ng Lo Sam, described as a police agent, but lately the keeper of a gambling house at Canton. The only witness at the trial who mentioned him was Kong Ngau Ying, since dead (page 12 of the Judge's Notes:- he described a meeting of the conspirators at C.'s house on the night of the murder, but does not say that C. was present). He is also mentioned in the dying declaration of Yeung Kui-wan, page 19, but it is there only said that one Kwang told the dying man that the Provincial Treasurer had commissioned C. to compass his murder. I do not notice Kwang's name in the list of witnesses now available. But I observe that the Attorney-General considers the statements of yourself and the Kongs to constitute should have been of opinion that the evidence against him was not of much value. He had been in In December, 1901, Mr. J. Scott, His Majesty's Consul General, examined the evidence that was then procurable against this man, and came to the conclusion that nothing could be proved. the employ of the Hongkong police, and, as Mr. Scott says: "went and came in the pay of Canton and Hong- kong alike, leaving no trace of his dealings, and so cleverly playing his double game that according to the highest legal opinion no conviction could be obtained against him in the Hongkong Courts." He was, however, expelled from Hongkong owing to the suspicions entertained of his complicity in the murder. To sum up so much as came out at the trial with regard to these three men, I think one can only say that there is evidence to implicate Tung Cheong (A.) in the commission of the murder, that there is some against the captain of the gunboat, though not so di- rect nor so strong, as having entered into a conspiracy to acy
Baseline (Original)
358 constitute a strong case against him. Otherwise I a reward for the murder of Yeung Kui-wan. It was in his barracks that the conspirators are said to have met (page 10). He is stated to have issued a certificate of merit to one of the persons impli- cated in the actual commission of the murder (page 11), and to have specially deputed him to carry it out (page 12). C. is Ng Lo Sam, described as a police agent, but lately the keeper of a gambling house at Canton. The only witness at the trial who mentioned him was Kong Ngau Ying, since dead (page 12 of the Judge's Notes:- he described a meeting of the conspirators at C.'s house on the night of the murder, but does not say that C, was present). He is also mentioned in the dying declaration of Yeung Kui-wan, page 19, but it is there only said that one Kwang told the dying man that the Provincial Treasurer had commis- sioned C. to compass his murder. I do not notice Kwang's name in the list of witnesses now available. But I observe that the Attorney-General considers the statements of yourself and the Kongs to consti- should have been of opinion that the evidence against him was not of much value. He had been in In December, 1001, Mr. J. Scott, His Majesty's Consul General, examined the evidence that was then procurable against this man, and came to the conclu- sion that nothing could be proved. the employ of the Hongkong police, and, as Mr. Scott says: "went and came in the pay of Canton and Hong- kong alike, leaving no trace of his dealings, and so cleverly playing his double game that according to the highest legal opinion no conviction could be obtained against him in the Hongkong Courts.* He was, how- expelled from Hongkong owing to the suspicions entertained of his complicity in the murder. ever To sum up so much as came out at the trial with regard to these three men, I think one can only say that there is evidence to implicate Tung Cheong (A.) in the commission of the murder, that there is somo against the captain of the gunboat, though not so di- rect nor so strong, as having entered into a conspir- tute acy
2026-06-02 05:15:09 · Baseline
View content

358

constitute a strong case against him.

Otherwise I

a reward for the murder of Yeung Kui-wan.

It was

in his barracks that the conspirators are said to

have met (page 10). He is stated to have issued

a certificate of merit to one of the persons impli-

cated in the actual commission of the murder (page

11), and to have specially deputed him to carry it

out (page 12).

C. is Ng Lo Sam, described as a police agent,

but lately the keeper of a gambling house at Canton.

The only witness at the trial who mentioned him

was Kong Ngau Ying, since dead (page 12 of the Judge's

Notes:- he described a meeting of the conspirators

at C.'s house on the night of the murder, but does

not say that C, was present). He is also mentioned

in the dying declaration of Yeung Kui-wan, page 19,

but it is there only said that one Kwang told the

dying man that the Provincial Treasurer had commis-

sioned C. to compass his murder. I do not notice

Kwang's name in the list of witnesses now available.

But I observe that the Attorney-General considers

the statements of yourself and the Kongs to consti-

should have been of opinion that the evidence against

him was not of much value.

He had been in

In December, 1001, Mr. J. Scott, His Majesty's

Consul General, examined the evidence that was then

procurable against this man, and came to the conclu-

sion that nothing could be proved.

the employ of the Hongkong police, and, as Mr. Scott

says: "went and came in the pay of Canton and Hong-

kong alike, leaving no trace of his dealings, and so

cleverly playing his double game that according to the

highest legal opinion no conviction could be obtained

against him in the Hongkong Courts.* He was, how-

expelled from Hongkong owing to the suspicions

entertained of his complicity in the murder.

ever

To sum up so much as came out at the trial with

regard to these three men, I think one can only say

that there is evidence to implicate Tung Cheong (A.)

in the commission of the murder, that there is somo

against the captain of the gunboat, though not so di-

rect nor so strong, as having entered into a conspir-

tute

acy

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.